Current:Home > reviewsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -Elevate Money Guide
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-18 07:07:45
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (99)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Fantasy football Week 10: Trade value chart and rest of season rankings
- Colin Allred, Ted Cruz reach end of Senate race that again tests GOP dominance in Texas
- First-term Democrat tries to hold on in Washington state district won by Trump in 2020
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Tennessee’s US Sen. Blackburn seeks reelection against Democratic state Rep. Gloria Johnson
- Tropical Storm Rafael to become hurricane before landfall in Cuba. Is US at risk?
- Lopsided fight to fill Feinstein’s Senate seat in liberal California favors Democrat Schiff
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Opinion: 76ers have themselves to blame for Joel Embiid brouhaha
Ranking
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Florida prosecutor says suspect in deadly Halloween shooting will be charged as an adult
- Ex-Ohio police officer found guilty of murder in 2020 Andre Hill shooting
- Bernie Marcus, The Home Depot co-founder and billionaire philanthropist, dies at 95
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Strike at Boeing was part of a new era of labor activism long in decline at US work places
- Mississippi Republican Sen. Roger Wicker is challenged by Democrat Ty Pinkins
- Ohio set to decide constitutional amendment establishing a citizen-led redistricting commission
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
First-term Democrat tries to hold on in Washington state district won by Trump in 2020
Golden Bachelor’s Theresa Nist Says Relocating Wasn’t the Only Factor Behind Gerry Turner Split
Alaska voters deciding a hard-fought race for the state’s only U.S. House seat, election issues
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, As It Stands
Beyoncé Channels Pamela Anderson in Surprise Music Video for Bodyguard
GOP Reps. Barr and Guthrie seek House chairs with their Kentucky reelection bids