Current:Home > ContactSocial Security checks face $17,400 cut if program isn't shored up, study says -Elevate Money Guide
Social Security checks face $17,400 cut if program isn't shored up, study says
View
Date:2025-04-17 07:08:33
Social Security is on track to cut benefits to retirees in 2033, when its trust fund reserves are forecast to be depleted. The reduction could be substantial, according to a new analysis.
Unless the program is shored up before 2033, the typical newly retired, dual-earner couple will see their Social Security checks reduced by $17,400 annually, or $1,450 per month, according to the report from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
A newly retired couple with one earner would see a cut of $13,100, the report said. The analysis, which is based on current dollars, doesn't forecast the impact on newly retired single earners, but the Social Security Administration has estimated that benefits will be cut by 23% in 2033 unless the program is strengthened.
Those cuts could prove devastating to roughly 50 million older Americans who receive Social Security checks, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget forecasting that "senior poverty would rise significantly upon insolvency." Still, there are plenty of proposals to fix Social Security's looming funding shortfall, either by raising taxes or increasing the retirement age, or a combination of the two.
The current average monthly benefit check for single earners is about $1,800, according to the Social Security Administration.
"Smash the cap"
Some Democratic lawmakers and left-leaning policy experts say there's a simple fix: "Smash the cap," which refers to the Social Security tax cap.
That cap, a feature of the program since its start in the 1930s following the Great Depression, means that any income over that level isn't subject to the Social Security payroll tax, which is 6.2% for workers and an additional 6.2% for employers. In 2023, the tax cap stands at $160,200, which means any income above that amount is exempt from the payroll tax.
But critics say this places the burden of funding Social Security on low- and middle-income earners, while higher-income Americans get a break. For instance, a middle-income worker earning less than the $160,200 cap in 2023 will pay an effective tax rate that is six times higher than that of a millionaire.
Eliminating the cap would subject higher earnings to payroll tax, generating additional revenue for Social Security and helping to stabilize its finances, proponents say.
Raise the retirement age
Some Republican lawmakers and right-leaning experts are opposed to higher taxes, however, and instead have proposed raising the retirement age.
Last year, some Republican lawmakers floated the idea of lifting the retirement age to 70 — from its current age of 66 to 67, depending on one's birth year — citing the "miracle" of longer life expectancies.
Yet critics point out that many people can't work until they are 70, due to health issues or other reasons. And even if an older worker could remain in the labor force until they were 70, it still would amount to a benefits cut because they would be losing between three to four years of Social Security checks as a result.
- In:
- Social Security
veryGood! (64174)
Related
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Former Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin says he’s putting together investor group to buy TikTok
- Get a $78 Anthropologie Pullover for $18, 25% off T3 Hair Tools, $800 off Avocado Organic Mattress & More
- Lionel Messi wears new Argentina Copa America 2024 jersey kit: Check out the new threads
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Grey’s Anatomy Stars Share Behind-the-Scenes Memories Before Season 20 Premiere
- What happens if you eat mold? Get to know the risks, according to a doctor
- Survivor Season 46 recap: Sinking tribe finds unexpected victory in Episode 3
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Cause a Racquet With SKIMS First Tennis Skirt, Plus More Aces From Lululemon, Amazon, and Gymshark
Ranking
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- SpaceX launch: Starship reaches new heights before being lost on re-entry over Indian Ocean
- Hunter Biden trial on felony gun charges tentatively set for week of June 3
- Zayn Malik Shares Rare Insight Into Life Away From Spotlight With His Daughter Khai
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Can smelling candles actually make you sick?
- Georgia school voucher bill narrowly clears longtime obstacle with state House passage
- AP Week in Pictures: North America
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Hurry, Lululemon Just Added New Styles to Their We Made Too Much Section—Score $39 Align Leggings & More
College swimmers, volleyball players sue NCAA over transgender policies
Internet mocks Free People 'micro' shorts, rebranding item as 'jundies,' 'vajeans,' among others
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Report finds flawed tactics, poor communication in a probe of New Mexico trooper’s death
Arkansas’ elimination of ‘X’ as option for sex on licenses and IDs endorsed by GOP lawmakers
Bodycam video released after 15-year-old with autism killed by authorities in California