Current:Home > FinanceSupreme Court rules against Navajo Nation in legal fight over water rights -Elevate Money Guide
Supreme Court rules against Navajo Nation in legal fight over water rights
View
Date:2025-04-18 17:51:06
Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against the Navajo Nation in a legal dispute involving water access for the tribe, finding a 1868 treaty does not require the United States to take affirmative steps to secure water for the Navajo.
The court divided 5-4 in its decision dismissing the suit brought by the Navajo Tribe against the U.S., with Justice Neil Gorsuch joining with the liberal wing of the bench in dissent.
Writing for the majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh pointed to the text and history of a 1868 peace treaty agreed to by the U.S. and Navajo Nation, which established the Navajo Reservation, to hold that the agreement does not require the U.S. to undergo efforts to secure water for the Navajos, like assessing the tribe's water needs, crafting a plan to secure the water that is needed and potentially building water infrastructure.
"The 1868 treaty reserved necessary water to accomplish the purpose of the Navajo Reservation," he said. "But the treaty did not require the United States to take affirmative steps to secure water for the Tribe."
Joining Kavanaugh's opinion were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett.
But Gorsuch, in a dissenting opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, said the majority rejected a request that the Navajo Nation never made. Rather than seeking to compel the U.S. government to take affirmative steps to secure water for the tribe, the conservative justice said the tribe has a "simple ask": for the U.S. to identify the water rights it holds for them.
"Where do the Navajo go from here?" Gorsuch wrote. "To date, their efforts to find out what water rights the United States holds for them have produced an experience familiar to any American who has spent time at the Department of Motor Vehicles. The Navajo have waited patiently for someone, anyone, to help them, only to be told (repeatedly) that they have been standing in the wrong line and must try another."
Noting the repeated attempts by the Navajo for the U.S. to provide an accounting of the water rights it holds on the tribe's behalf, Gorsuch said their protracted efforts stretch back to when "Elvis was still making his rounds on the Ed Sullivan Show."
The Navajo Reservation, which has a western boundary that runs along part of the Colorado River, is the largest Native American reservation in the U.S., encompassing more than 17 million acres. Of the tribe's more than 300,000 members, roughly 170,000 live on the reservation.
Despite lying largely within the Colorado River Basin, water is scarce, and up to 91% of Navajo households on some parts of the reservation lack access to water, according to court papers.
During oral arguments in March, the Biden administration told the court that the U.S. has taken numerous steps to help the Navajo Tribe with its water needs, including securing hundreds of thousands of acre-feet of water and approving billions of dollars for water infrastructure on the reservation.
But the Navajo argued these actions failed to satisfy the government's obligations under the 1868 treaty and, in 2003, sued U.S. agencies. The tribe sought to compel the U.S. government to determine the water required to meet the needs of the Navajo Nation's lands in Arizona and come up with a plan to fulfill those needs, pursuant to the 1868 treaty.
Several states — Arizona, Nevada and Colorado — intervened against the tribe to protect their interests in water from the Colorado River.
A federal district court in Arizona dismissed the suit brought by the Navajo Tribe, finding that the 1868 treaty didn't require the U.S. to take affirmative steps to secure water for the tribe. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reversed, holding that the U.S. has a duty to take action to secure the water needed for the reservation and allowing the suit to proceed.
In his opinion, Kavanaugh said while the treaty required the U.S. to build schools, a chapel, and carpenter and blacksmith shops on the reservation, and mandated the government provide teachers for Navajo schools for at least 10 years, it "said nothing about any affirmative duty for the United States to secure water."
"Of course, it is not surprising that a treaty ratified in 1868 did not envision and provide for all of the Navajos' current water needs 155 years later, in 2023," he said. "Under the Constitution's separation of powers, Congress and the President may update the law to meet modern policy priorities and needs. To that end, Congress may enact — and often has enacted — legislation to address the modern water needs of Americans, including the Navajos, in the West."
Gorsuch, though, said the promise of a "permanent home" extended in the 1868 treaty secures "some measure" of water rights for the Navajo.
"The government owes the Tribe a duty to manage the water it holds for the Tribe in a legally responsible manner," he wrote in dissent. "In this lawsuit, the Navajo ask the United States to fulfill part of that duty by assessing what water rights it holds for them. The government owes the Tribe at least that much."
veryGood! (62124)
Related
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Average rate on a 30-year mortgage eases to 6.46%, the lowest level in 15 months
- Sicily Yacht Company CEO Shares Endless Errors That May Have Led to Fatal Sinking Tragedy
- Emily Ratajkowski Has the Best Reaction After Stranger Tells Her to “Put on a Shirt” Mid-Video
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- French actor Gerard Depardieu should face trial over rape allegations, prosecutors say
- An Iceland volcano erupts again but spares the nearby town of Grindavik for now
- FACT FOCUS: A look back at false and misleading claims made during the the Democratic convention
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- 'Pommel horse guy' Stephen Nedoroscik joins 'Dancing with the Stars' Season 33
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Who's performed at the DNC? Lil Jon, Patti LaBelle, Stevie Wonder, more hit the stage
- 'Megalopolis' trailer sparks controversy with fabricated quotes from film critics
- ‘The answer is no': Pro-Palestinian delegates say their request for a speaker at DNC was shut down
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- A teen’s murder, mold in the walls: Unfulfilled promises haunt public housing
- Jennifer Lopez Requests to Change Her Last Name Amid Ben Affleck Divorce
- Judge Mathis' Wife Linda Files for Divorce After 39 Years of Marriage
Recommendation
Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
Superyacht maker's CEO: Bayesian's crew made an 'incredible mistake'
Workers at Canadian National Railway Co. will start returning to work Friday, union says
Two tons of meth disguised as watermelon seized at border; valued over $5 million
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
Sabrina Carpenter Walks in on Jenna Ortega Showering in “Taste” Teaser
Which Love Is Blind UK Couples Got Married and Which Ones Split?
Man accused of faking death and fleeing US to avoid rape charges will stand trial, Utah judge rules